Session: #1163

Regular session

The importance of de-escalation and peaceful resolution of conflicts is of tragic relevance nowadays. In Conflict Archaeology the material traces of primarily violent events have been the focus within the last decades. Consequently, despite their historical and political significance, the material evidence for de-escalation strategies has received limited attention in archaeological research and remains underrepresented.
De-escalation and resolution strategies can be considered an integral part of conflict dynamics, profoundly influencing the social consequences and economic costs for the communities involved.
Nevertheless, differing from the historical sciences, where the assessment of non-violent conflict resolutions relies on the availability of written records, archaeologists often contend that demonstrating de-escalation processes is challenging.
This session aims to stimulate a comprehensive discussion on the potential archaeological evidence that could shed light on de-escalation strategies. For example, recent archaeological studies have discussed fortification sites or weapon hoard finds as potential indicators for conflict resolution in past societies. Furthermore, it provides a well-rounded perspective on the multifaceted nature of conflict archaeology and the enduring relevance of de-escalating approaches in the quest for cooperation within human societies.
We invite contributions from diverse time spans (pre- and early-state communities), disciplines, and geographical perspectives.

peacemaking, conflict resolution, de-escalation strategies, conflict management, warfare, violence

no

no

no

no

no

Anna Loy (Germany) ^1,2

Valerio Gentile (Netherlands) ³
Anna-Theres Andersen (Germany) ^1,2